I have never made much of a secret of the fact that my
favourite film series is, by some considerable distance, the James Bond films.
Naturally, then, I was excited by the release of the new film, Skyfall, which I went to see in the
cinema this week.
Pre-
Skyfall
preparation – reading the reviews in the papers aside – involved re-watching
Daniel Craig’s first appearance as 007 in
Casino
Royale (inexplicably, the only Bond film I own on DVD – I still haven’t got
round to replacing the VHS tapes), a repeat of
You Only Live Twice (screenplay by Roald Dahl, I kid you not) and
the generally excellent
Top Gear
special on Bond cars. Top Gear has in my opinion gone off the boil in recent
years, becoming (as the Bond films did at some point) very much a parody of
itself, but this particular special was definitely worth tuning in for. The
very good interviews aside, the story of how an Aston Martin DB5 came to be
used in
Goldfinger was definitely
worth retelling (in an attitude similar to that taken by British Leyland over
The Italian Job, Aston Martin initially didn’t
want anything to do with it, and the makers only insisted on an Aston because
Bond had driven one – a DB Mark III – in the novel). Plus, there was a real
treat in store in the form of
converting a Lotus Excel for
use as an actual submarine, in homage to
The Spy Who Loved Me. Only the people at
Top Gear could have come up with that.
And so to the movie itself. Well, almost. The film was
billed as starting at 7pm, although this was of course the time that the
half-hour of adverts and trailers was due to start, some of the former being
obvious Bond tie-ins which included, rather annoyingly, quite a bit of the
pre-credits sequence from the film I was about to see.
The film was certainly more dialogue-heavy and
character-driven than previous Bond films, and I don’t see that as being a bad
thing, especially with a cast like this. Ever since Casino Royale, there’s been a move towards redefining what a Bond
film is (as well as being a direct sequel, Quantum
of Solace was, to all intents and purposes, a revenge-flick – the Bond
franchise had never done the former before, while as far as the latter is
concerned the only previous one had been Licence
to Kill), and as far as this fan is concerned that’s no bad thing. Skyfall breaks new ground for the Bond
films in that it’s the first to explicitly emphasise 007’s back-story – and what’s
wrong with revealing a bit more about the main character? In the books, Ian
Fleming didn’t really get round to this until rather late in the day, with the
story of Bond’s parents being killed when he was a boy not being told until You Only Live Twice, the last Bond novel
to be published while Fleming was still alive.
In the book, this was told in the form of an obituary
written by M, which duly features in Skyfall
after Bond is presumed to have been killed in action in the pre-credits
sequence. That he is in fact alive and living on a beach somewhere is also
taken from You Only Live Twice (the
novel, not the film).
Craig is, I think, an excellent Bond – tough and determined
but, unlike most of the others, showing a vulnerable side and literally being
seen to bleed (in flat contradiction of Q’s final piece of advice to Bond in The World Is Not Enough). He brings
something to the role the others didn’t; he certainly looks like more of a
killer than Roger Moore in his prime, and yet the vulnerability (an area
previously explored only by the seriously under-rated George Lazenby) adds
something to the character, making James Bond appear as something more than a wise-cracking
government hit-man. Of the old Bonds, he’s closets to Timothy Dalton, who was
himself perhaps too serious coming in after Roger Moore (Pierce Brosnan
certainly sent things back the other way by restoring a lot of the gags). It
helps, I think, that such a portrayal of Bond came at the same time as a
welcome reboot of the franchise, which has helped those responsible for the
films in that they no longer feel obliged to stick to a prescribed Bond
formula. If you want to know why they had to reboot Bond, simply note that Die Another Day – the most
self-parodying of the Bond films as well as one of the most extravagant in
terms of special effects – was released in the same year as The Bourne Identity. Suddenly, overblown
special effects didn’t look too clever, and as well as establishing a new
timeline for Bond, Casino Royale was
rather stripped-down compared to what had gone before.
Of the other characters, Judi Dench was on top form as M,
and Javier Bardem brought in a performance as the villain that hasn’t been seen
in many a year – I would not be surprised to find Raoul Silva spoken of in the
same breath as Auric Goldfinger and Francisco Scaramanga in years to come. A
renegade MI6 agent as the baddie has been done before, but not like this (and a
cyber-terrorist to boot; very modern!). Throw in the likes of Ralph Fiennes and
Albert Finney, and it’s obvious that Sam Mendes established a heavyweight cast
for this, so much so that I’m struggling to think of a Bond film that was as
well-acted as this one.
The relative lack of gadgets aside (these were dismissed
by the new Q in a throwaway remark about MI6 not going in for exploding pens
any more) was more than compensated for by the appearance of the legendary DB5,
complete with the optional extras it had in Goldfinger.
Even though we all knew what was coming thanks to the publicity, there was
still an audible gasp in the cinema when Bond opened the lock-up to reveal the
Aston.
Aside from a couple of times where Bond looks at his
watch (yes, it’s an Omega, we get it) and an obvious close-up of his mobile
phone, I don’t think that the product placement distracted from my enjoyment of
the film. Having read the books, I’ve argued on many occasions that product
placement with James Bond is not a recent phenomenon but something that goes
back to Ian Fleming himself, who with his journalist’s eye for detail used
brand-names as a means of making sure that Bond appeared sophisticated and
worldly-wise – the Bond of the books wears certain brands or styles of clothes
and smokes a particular (specially-made) brand of cigarette, for example, and
when reciting the
famous
cocktail recipe in Casino Royale
he really does specify Gordon’s rather than just gin. I guess the difference is
that Fleming wasn’t getting paid to do it (although by all accounts he did
receive the odd freebie after publication), whereas (for example) Heineken paid
a lot of money to ensure that it’s their beer that Bond is seen to be drinking.
Sticking with drinks, I note that Bollinger is now the official Bond champagne,
although I seem to recall that in the books Bond liked Pol Roger. Or was it
Taittinger?
All in all, I really liked it. After the relative
disappointment of Quantum of Solace, Skyfall brings the Bond franchise, and
Craig’s Bond for that matter, back to the superlative heights of Casino Royale.
Daniel Craig is no longer standing in the shadows of any of his predecessors.
He’s a great Bond but he’s not the best there’s ever been – yet. However, give
him a couple more, and the original may no longer be the best.