James Hunt
was before my time. When I started to pay attention to Formula One, he was a
witty and rather dry commentator who served as a pretty good brake for Murray
Walker’s high-octane enthusiasm, even though he seemed to have it in for the
otherwise innocuous Riccardo Patrese.
It was a bit later that I found out that he’d won the world
championship in one
of the most exciting seasons in the history of F1. In a sense, James Hunt
was very much a 1970s sort of hero; a larger-than-life character who smoked
like a chimney, boozed into the wee small hours, didn’t give a damn about dress
codes and was as famous for his exploits in bed as he was for his driving –
which was of the devil-may-care variety.
Recently, interest in his rivalry with Niki Lauda has been revived
by the movie Rush which has appealed
to people far beyond the relatively small group of F1 fans – no small feat, as F1
doesn’t have a very good track record (no pun intended) when it’s made into
movies and that’s before you take into account the obvious fact that it has
little appeal to the American market. I’d been looking forward to this film for
months, and last Tuesday I went to see it.
The team behind this film are writer Peter Morgan and
director Ron Howard, who have previously been responsible for making a
political interview into a very good movie (Frost/Nixon).
What they have done with Rush is to
turn an exciting sporting rivalry (albeit one of limited appeal) into a truly
electric cinematic experience.
In my opinion, the setting is as responsible for this as the
Hunt-Lauda rivalry. On one level, the 1970s were an exciting time for F1.
Technology was being pushed to limits that are seen as highly innovative even
now – this was the era of ground effect,
Tyrell’s six-wheeler (which
can be seen in the film) and the Brabham fan car, all of
which are illegal nowadays. TV was also starting to get involved in a bigger
way than before; the title-deciding Japanese Grand Prix of 1976 was the first
to be broadcast around the world via satellite, and the BBC’s coverage of F1 –
complete with the ever-excitable Walker
and the iconic theme tune (Fleetwood Mac’s The
Chain) properly got going two years later.
But there was a darker side, and that was the ever-present
risk of danger at appallingly high levels that simply aren’t acceptable nowadays. Just a couple
of minutes of looking at old footage on YouTube or on programmes about the history of F1 that occasionally get shown on BBC4 will show you cars running four
abreast, big crashes and near-primitive safety standards – think poorly-equipped and under-trained marshals,
and everyone smoking in the pit lane mere feet from all that high-octane
petrol. Even at the time, people were calling for change, and not just any
people but multiple world champions like Jackie Stewart, who knew at first-hand
what the risks were and stuck his neck out by protesting against them.
Hunt and his contemporaries were well aware that whenever
they lined up on the grid, there was a very real chance that not all of them
would be alive by the end of the race; in the world of F1, it had been thus for
as long as the sport had existed (although it would soon change) and goes some way towards explaining the ‘work hard, play
hard’ mentality of drivers like, well, Hunt himself – who lost his appetite for
F1 following the death of his friend Ronnie Petersen at Monza in 1978
(for which he blamed Patrese, which explains his later commentary-box
antagonism towards the Italian).
That’s before you get to the circuits, some of which just
hadn’t evolved over the years as the cars had got bigger and faster. The most
notorious was the truly terrifying old Nürburgring, a
fourteen-mile circuit in the Eifel mountains of western Germany with more corners than
anyone could remember. The ‘Green Hell’, as Stewart himself called it, was a
throwback to the 1930s with much of the circuit not being protected by crash
barriers and marshals being non-existent for most of the route. There were
blind crests where the cars momentarily took off, bits that were dangerously narrow and
such was its length that choosing between wet and dry tyres was impossible as
parts of the circuit could be waterlogged while other bits were dry (a point emphasised in the film).
At the centre of Rush
is the German Grand
Prix at this circuit – a pivotal point in the season. It was at this race
that Lauda, having failed to get the race cancelled on safety grounds, suffered
an horrific near-fatal accident when his car spun and burst into flames. He had
to be dragged from his car by four fellow-drivers (who, unlike the marshals, wore fire-proof clothing), and was then airlifted to a
hospital where his injuries were so severe that a priest gave him the last
rites. The circuit was never used in F1 again. Miraculously, Lauda was back racing
six weeks later, and the battle for the championship went down to the
last race of the season, in Japan.
As you’ve probably guessed, I really enjoyed Rush. The use of restored and replica
1970s F1 cars, filmed at some of the circuits that were actually used in the
1976 season, was spot-on. The lead actors have done a great job. Chris
Hemsworth brilliantly plays Hunt as a fun-loving a party animal who lives life
to the full, while Daniel Brühl has done a great job in revealing the
vulnerability of Niki Lauda that existed beneath the cold, calculating surface
(heck, he even looks a bit like Lauda did before his accident). In real life,
Hunt and Lauda were good friends despite their differences but it suits the
film’s narrative to portray them as rivals – although the film does reveal a
sense of camaraderie between them, as evidenced by the scene where Hunt beats
up a journalist for insulting Lauda and the closing scenes.
OK, so there were a few parts of the story that didn’t fit
with the historical record – for example, it wasn’t really Lauda who dobbed the
McLaren team to the stewards after Hunt won the Spanish Grand Prix, and Hunt is
shown as having not been disqualified after winning the British Grand Prix.
I guess that that iconic shot at Brands Hatch where the two cars disappear behind
some trees with Lauda in front, only to emerge with Hunt in the lead, was too
good an image to sully with another disqualification argument.
I’m usually the first person to pick up on historical
inaccuracies in films but, do you know what? In Rush, they didn’t matter.
The film really was that good.
1 comment:
Great read, thanks Nick
Post a Comment