When I first got into John Buchan, I focussed on his
‘shockers’ – the adventures of Richard Hannay and some of those concerning the semi-autobiographical
Sir Edward Leithen (although it was only in recent months that I read Sick Heart River, the one set in Canada
– of which more at a later date). Over the years I also encountered his short
stories, one of which happens to feature an elderly (and decidedly
unimpressive) Bonnie Prince Charlie (the story in question being ‘The Company
of the Marjorlaine’, which can be found in The
Best Short Stories of John Buchan, Volume 1). Like many a novelist, Buchan
wasn’t averse to the odd walk-on appearance by a real person (in Greenmantle, Richard Hannay’s escapades
in Germany during the First World War include a brief meeting with the Kaiser
who is not depicted as some sort of panto villain; even when he was writing his
‘shockers’, Buchan was far too clever for that), and it’s the appearance of a
real person that was what fascinated me about one of Buchan’s more overlooked
novels.
The Young Pretender, or rather the rebellion he led in
1745, forms the backdrop of Midwinter
(1923) which tells the story of Alastair Maclean, a young Jacobite officer on a
mission in the English Midlands of the pre-industrial age. His task is to
establish how much support the Prince can expect from the English as he advances
south, and the main thrust of the plot concerns his attempt to stop two
noblemen (who are posing as Jacobite sympathisers) from passing false information
to Bonnie Prince Charlie (in this, an unseen character); they are doing this while
simultaneously passing information about actual Jacobite sympathisers to the
Hannoverian government in the hope of being rewarded with the lands which those
sympathisers will forfeit in the event of the rebellion being defeated. Maclean
is, though, conflicted because he happens to fall in love with the wife of one
of the antagonists, and he faces the age-old dilemma of having to choose
between love and duty.
In some ways, this is a reversal of Sir Walter Scott’s
historical novel Waverley (in which,
to be brief, an English officer heads north of the border during the Forty-Five),
although as far as resourceful (and fictional) young military men are concerned
Maclean is a much more convincing character than that romantic and incompetent
fool Edward Waverley ever was. Like Waverley, Maclean meets many characters who
represent the country which he is visiting, from country squires to gipsies –
among them the titular Amos Midwinter, leader of a shadowy, semi-pagan group of
innkeepers, charcoal-burners and peasants going by names such as the ‘Spoonbills’ or the ‘Naked
Men’ which represents an England that “has outlived Roman and Saxon and Dane
and Norman … the land of the edge of the moorland and the rim of the forests
and the twilight before dawn”. For a titular character, his appearances are
fleeting which has led some to suspect that Buchan may have intended to return
to him and his group (representing an England that, by the above description
alone, would appear to predate England itself) in a later work.
The highlight of Midwinter,
though, is the appearance of one Samuel Johnson as one of the main supporting
characters. This is in itself a clever piece of plotting by Buchan, as it is
not known what the great man of letters was actually doing at the time of the
Forty-Five. In his Life of Samuel Johnson,
James Boswell stated that “his literary career appears to have been almost
totally suspended in the years 1745 and 1746, those years which were marked by
a civil war in Great-Britain”, adding that Johnson, being an old-fashioned sort
of Tory, “had a tenderness for that unfortunate House [of Stuart] … some may
fancifully imagine, that a sympathetick anxiety impeded the exertion of his
intellectual powers”. Boswell is used as part of the framing device for the
story – in this case, a text supposedly written by Johnson’s biographer is
purportedly found in a solicitor’s office that claims to shed light on the
great lexicographer’s ‘missing years’. Thus is the main story, that of Captain
Maclean’s mission, introduced.
The Johnson of Midwinter
is introduced as a “big shambling fellow” of whom “disease and rough usage had
wiped every sign of youth from his face. That face was large, heavily-featured
and pitted deep with the scars of scrofula … he wore his own hair, straight and
lank and tied with a dusty ribbon. His clothes were of some coarse grey stuff
and much worn … he had no boots, but instead clumsy unbuckled shoes and black
worsted stockings.” Being an embodiment of the ‘John Bull’ type of Englishman,
he eats and drinks heartily, although his well-known physical traits are not
ignored; his short-sightedness is touched upon and at one point he suffers from
“a grievous melancholy … his left leg twitching like a man with the palsy.” But
he is identified as a good man of “simplicity and courage and honest
friendship”, speaking with a “queer provincial accent” yet “at moments he had a
fine dignity, and his diction was metropolitan if his pronunciation was
rustic.”
Naturally for a man reckoned to be the second-most quoted
Englishman in history (after Shakespeare), this is a character who talks
“wisely, shrewdly, truculently, and with a gusto comparable to that which he
displayed in the business of eating”. Buchan of course couldn’t resist inserting
a few classic Johnson quotes into the character’s dialogue, and who can blame
him for doing so? If one is going to have Samuel Johnson as a character in a
novel, one must have him speak like the real thing although quite a few of the
quotes are reworded to suit the plot rather than inserted verbatim. On
encountering Maclean in one of several country pubs that feature in Midwinter, Johnson declares that: “Of
all the good gifts of a beneficient Providence to men … I think that none
excels a well-appointed inn”. Claret, he advises, is “but a liquor for boys”,
while “for men port, and for heroes brandy.” On Midwinter and his group, he
declares that “when one praises rusticity it is because he is denied the joys
of town. A man may be tired of the country, but when he is tired of London he
is tired of life.” On learning of Maclean’s profession, he declares that:
“Every man thinks meanly of himself for not having been a soldier” (that one I
had thought to be from Kipling, but my copy of The Concise Oxford Dictionary of Quotations attributes those words
to Johnson). He also chants “what sounded like Latin hexameters” and expresses
a desire to visit the Western Isles one day – which, of course, he would do with
Boswell in 1773.
His presence in the English countryside in 1745 (he had
moved to London in 1737) is explained by his being a tutor at a country house,
which is how he encounters a young lady called Claudia, the wife of one of the novel’s
antagonists and Maclean’s love interest. He’s not just there to talk, though –
he spends quite a bit of time in the saddle and gets involved in the fight
scenes as well (in a fist-fight, Johnson – a much bigger man than his opponent –
has “no skill, but immense reach and strength … He simply beat down the other’s
guard, reckless of the blows he received, and presently dealt him such a clout
that he measured his length on the floor”), and it is he who helps Maclean to
decide what to do with regards to the protagonist’s love/duty dilemma.
Perhaps unsurprisingly, little is made in Midwinter of Johnson’s noted antagonism towards
the Scots; he befriends Maclean and helps him on his quest, and after hearing of
the Prince’s retreat north from Derby he acquires a sword and expresses a
desire to accompany his new friend to Scotland to fight for the Jacobite cause,
and even “change my name to MacIan, and be as fierce as any Highlander” – thus trying
to put his above quote about soldiers into practice by becoming a man of action!
In the event, though, he is convinced that he should return to his wife and his
writing career in London.
Although not in the same vein as Buchan’s ‘shockers’,
this is an historical novel par
excellence – there’s intrigue and treachery aplenty as Maclean is
ultimately faced with an uncomfortable choice (albeit one not unfamiliar to
romantic heroes). What elevates it above most, though, is a convincing and
realistic portrayal of a great historical figure.
No comments:
Post a Comment