We live in an age where there’s a lot of popular history
about, and some of it manages to combine a high standard of writing with
excellent historical research. Here are three of the best that I’ve enjoyed
reading recently:
Popping up on TV as well as in print, Dominic Sandbrook
is one of those historians who’s pretty good on revisionism – reinterpreting
historical facts by looking at the evidence from a different perspective and
coming up with something that challenges the accepted historical view of historical
events; the old A.J.P. Taylor maxim of nothing being inevitable until it
happens is very much Sandbrook’s guiding principle, it seems. In the first of
his four books on recent British history, Never
Had It So Good: A History of Britain from Suez to the Beatles, he strikes a
fine balance between the political, the economic and the cultural, looking
below the surface of events. The travails of Harold Macmillan’s various
Chancellors (Reggie Maudling strikes me as being one of the most amusing people
ever to have held that particular post) are juxtaposed with sections on movies,
books (Ian Fleming of course, but also Kingsley Amis and long-forgotten types like
Colin Wilson), television (this was the time when ITV started and the BBC
entered one of its most creative periods), moral panic in the newspapers over
immigration and the sexual behaviour of teenagers (plus ca change…), the early Sixties satire boom and pop music; plenty
of stuff in that last bit on Lonnie Donegan, Billy Fury and Acker Bilk (whose
presence is explained by the notion that in early 1962 there were those who
thought that trad jazz would be the defining sound of the Sixties) before we
get to the Beatles (where Sandbrook’s revisionism is clearly shown, with there
being nothing inevitable about Beatlemania, the last remark on which goes to Ted
Heath of all people – as Trade Secretary at the time, he remarked that the demand
for Beatles-style jackets in late 1963 single-handedly saved Britain’s
corduroy industry). It’s a long book (738 pages, not including the footnotes)
but it’s well worth persevering with. The set-piece chapter is the one on the
Profumo scandal – which has quite the build-up by being referenced or alluded
to in previous chapters before, following an account of the Vassall scandal, it
breaks out in a surprisingly low-key fashion (the central point, a junior
minister’s affair with a call-girl, lasted just a few weeks) before becoming something
that “might have been scripted to encompass a wide range of sensitive issues of
the early sixties: espionage and subversion, sexual wantonness, unchecked
materialism, the supposed exoticism and criminality of immigrant communities
and the nepotism and ineptitude of the Conservative government ... it touched on
public and private anxieties that had already been festering for years.” Interesting
times, indeed, and fascinatingly chronicled here.
History of a somewhat different nature is covered by
David Aaronovitch in his Voodoo Histories:
How Conspiracy Theory has Shaped Modern History. If we really do live in a
conspiracy-obsessed age – and reactions to recent events both here and in the United States
have presented little evidence to the contrary – then perhaps a look at
conspiracy theories of the past, the truth behind them and why so many are
willing to believe them (the need for a certain type of narrative is a key part of this) is no bad thing. Thus, we have a chapter on the
infamous Protocols of the Elders of Zion
(a document which, despite being exposed as a forgery in 1921, did much to fuel
anti-Semitism in the twentieth century and is still doing the rounds in the
Middle East) and a somewhat lighter chapter on the pseudo-history concerning
the Priory of Sion myth (amusingly entitled ‘Holy Blood, Holy Grail, Holy
Shit’). Showing that conspiracy repeats itself, there are links made between
the conspiracy theories surrounding the deaths of Marilyn Monroe and Princess
Diana, and also (exploring a particularly British vein here) between the deaths
of Hilda Murrell and David Kelly. Personally, I’d’ve liked to have seen what
Aaronovitch might have to say about the various conspiracy theories surrounding
Harold Wilson, but what makes this book so relevant for readers today is the
American stuff. When Aaronovitch turns his attention Stateside, there are
chapters on conspiracy theories about Pearl Harbour, various Clinton-related
cover-ups, the 9/11 ‘truthers’ and the Obama ‘birthers’; those last two show
how belief in conspiracy theories has risen with the advent of the Internet (“Cyberspace
communities of semi-anonymous and occasionally invented individuals have grown
up … the democratic quality of the Net has permitted the release of a mass of
undifferentiated information, some of it authoritative, some speculative, some
absurd”). As this book was published in 2010, there’s nothing about Donald Trump’s involvement in the ‘birther’ nonsense, although if Aaronovitch is going to
do a second edition he’d probably need to include a whole chapter (maybe more), building on the post-Internet rise in the popularity of conspiracy theories, about
the uses of conspiracy theories as political weapons in this year’s
Presidential election. This book is intelligently written and hugely enjoyable,
and a good one to have read before the next time someone brings up the subject
of the ‘truth’ about, say, 9/11 or the pseudo-history behind The Da Vinci Code.
No comments:
Post a Comment