King Arthur, it seems,
can still grab people’s attention. The mythical Once and Future King of the
Britons has cropped up twice on the telly recently – first with someone coming
up with a theory (or rather, another theory) about where Camelot may have been
located, and then in the title of a documentary that, as it turned out, wasn’t
really about him.
The latest Camelot
theory came from the TV presenter Nick Knowles who, while plugging a special
edition of his show DIY SOS on The One Show last
month, decided to go a bit off-message and state that he, or rather he and a
professor from Bristol University, has (have?) a new theory about the location
of Arthur’s court. Cirencester, apparently, is where the Arthur and his knights
met around a round table that was in fact the old Roman amphitheatre there. In
Roman times, the Gloucestershire market town was Corinium, a fort built at the
point where the Fosse Way crosses the River Churn which became one of the
biggest cities in Roman Britain.
Archaeological evidence
has shown that in the period after the Romans left the amphitheatre was
fortified but it takes quite a leap of the imagination to go from there to
claiming that this little corner of the Cotswolds was once Camelot – a place
that’s also been claimed to have been identified as having been in Cornwall, Hampshire, Somerset or even Yorkshire, and that’s before you take into account
the various possible Welsh locations that have been suggested over the years.
I’m not convinced by
this new claim. If you’re going to go around stating that the round table part
of the King Arthur legend is based on the notion that a Dark Ages warrior
leader might have met with his followers in an amphitheatre (which makes
sense), then the one at the old Roman legionary fortress at Caerleon over in
south-eastern Wales is a much better bet.
Next up was a BBC2
documentary called King Arthur’s
Britain: The Truth Unearthed which was broadcast a couple of weeks
ago. Fronted by Alice Roberts – a presenter with much more credibility than Mr
Knowles, she being an academic (the Professor of Public Engagement in Science
at Birmingham University, no less) with shows like Time Team and Coast on her
CV – this focussed on a place that has long been associated with Arthur; in
fact, according to the legends it’s where his life began. Tintagel, on
Cornwall’s north coast.
What followed wasn’t
really about Arthur – somewhat unsurprisingly, the story (as told by the medieval
chronicler/historian Geoffrey of Monmouth, whose rather fanciful writings
provide us with the basis of the King Arthur legends as we know them today) of
his having been conceived on a stormy night at Tintagel during which his dad
made use of Merlin’s magic to trick his mum into thinking that he was actually
her husband was quickly dismissed as legend rather than fact (but then, one of
the key things to remember is that much of the Arthur story is more legend than
fact; in fact, when touching on anything relating to King Arthur it is worth
remembering that line from The Man Who Shot
Liberty Valance – “when the legend becomes fact, print the legend”).
There were also some rather cheap-looking animated graphics but I think those
can safely be disregarded as unimportant.
There were two main
strands – an archaeological dig at Tintagel itself (long known to have been a
high-status settlement in the Dark Ages, the focus being on the rocky
peninsular known as Tintagel Island, upon which the medieval castle was later
built; historically, this was always regarded as being distinct from the
village on the mainland which was called Trevena until the mid-nineteenth
century) and a wider look at archaeological studies across the country in order
to find evidence for the Anglo-Saxon invasion during the post-Roman period
which provided the backdrop for the legends of Arthur which originate in the
Celtic/British resistance to this new influx. Although he wasn’t mentioned in
the earliest records of the time (not that there are many of those), it is
Arthur who over time emerged in the stories about an heroic leader who led the
fight against the invaders.
Professor Roberts
concluded that the available archaeological evidence doesn’t really support the
idea of a large-scale invasion, contrary to what the chroniclers (not just Geoffrey of
Monmouth but also the monk Gildas, who was writing in the sixth century) tell
us; a very detailed study in Yorkshire has revealed evidence for settlement
rather than conquest, while a scan of an Anglo-Saxon cross found in a grave in
Cambridgeshire and DNA analysis of human remains points more to co-existence and assimilation than conflict. That said, there does seem to have been a clear cultural divide
between eastern Britain (which was being settled by the Anglo-Saxons and so was
linked primarily with Northern Europe) and the west. The dig at Tintagel
unearthed a lot of high-end pottery which hinted at trading links with the Mediterranean world having been maintained after the Romans had left (the most
obvious commodity that the Cornish of the Dark Ages had to trade with was
quickly and correctly identified as tin). Then there was an inscribed piece of
stone which seemed to indicate that the people who lived there were probably
Christians. By placing King Arthur’s conception at Tintagel, maybe Geoffrey of
Monmouth was alluding to the importance of that place in the Dark Ages?
All very interesting,
fascinating in part. Yet I couldn’t help but think I’ve heard a lot of this
before. It took me a couple of minutes to figure out where – a TV academic of
an older vintage called Michael Wood, who covered King Arthur in In Search of the Dark
Ages and
in a couple of chapters of a later book called In Search of England.
In the former, a TV series which aired between 1978 and 1980 and can now be
found on YouTube, he too sought the facts behind the Arthurian legends by
looking at how archaeologists were trying to piece together what happened in
Britain after the Romans left (during the course of which he visited the
amphitheatre at Cirencester) and found evidence hinting at continuity rather than conquest in Dark Ages Britain before going off to look at hill-forts in rural Southern England and concluding by casting doubt on whether King Arthur really existed. In the latter, he referred to a stone with an
inscription on it being unearthed at a 1998 archaeological dig at Tintagel,
which at the time generated quite a bit of excitement due to the name on it,
Artognou, being not a million miles from ‘Arthur’ although it’s a bit of a
stretch of the imagination to link the stone with the Once and Future King!
I'm a freelance writer based in North London; areas of expertise include history, books, birds, travel, food, walking and cricket. I can be contacted via the following email address: njyoung78@hotmail.com
30.9.18
13.9.18
Babs versus the Blue Bird
Not far from the beach at Pendine in Carmarthenshire is a
small museum called the Pendine Museum of Speed, a modest and infrequently open
establishment which pays tribute to Pendine’s history as a venue for land speed
records attempts. The main feature, albeit one that is often absent from the
museum’s otherwise very modest collection, is one of the cars that featured in
a couple of those attempts, a white-painted monster of a vehicle that dates
back to the 1920s when the boundaries of speed were being pushed by specially-built
racing-cars that were fitted with aeroplane engines. The car is called Babs, and back in 1926 she became the
fastest car in the world, and she did that on Pendine Sands.
By the 1920s, the land speed record had got to the point
where it was no longer feasible to use roads or race-tracks due to the
straight-line distances that were required, for as well as the one-kilometre
length along which the cars were timed the cars also needed space to accelerate
and brake before and after said flying kilometre (it was a kilometre rather
than a mile because the record’s first regulators were French). Long and
straight stretches of sand beach were being sought out, and the one at Pendine
is six miles if you don’t count the bit at the eastern end that curves round
towards Laugharne; with the tide out and in fair weather, it was and for that
matter still is an ideal venue to drive a car in a straight line as fast as it can
go. Twice within the hour, for from the beginning the land speed record had to
be an average of two runs, one in either direction in order to negate any benefits
that gradient or the wind might give.
The first land speed record attempt at Pendine Sands was made
by Malcolm Campbell in September 1924. Campbell, who’d got into motor racing
prior to the First World War, set the record in a modified Sunbeam racing-car
that he’d called Blue Bird due to his
habit of racing in cars painted blue (as opposed to British racing green).
Powered by an 18.3-litre aircraft engine, it had been raced at Brooklands and
indeed used to set a land speed record at that circuit before Campbell acquired,
repainted and renamed it. Before arriving at Pendine, Campbell and Blue Bird had already made two attempts
at the land speed record elsewhere, although they were deemed invalid due to
the use of unapproved timing equipment. At Pendine, though, his team were using
the proper equipment and Blue Bird
set a new land speed record of 146mph. The following summer, they were back and
the record was raised to 150mph.
Campbell had been keen to break his own record because
he’d heard that someone else was preparing for a land speed record attempt in a
more powerful car. John Parry-Thomas was a Welsh engineer who, in addition to
having made a name for himself racing at Brooklands in the early 1920s, had
been involved with the development of the car that came to be known as Blue Bird. This had motivated him to try
for the land speed record for himself, which led to the purchase of a large racing-car
called Chitty IV from the estate of Louis
Zborowski, an aristocratic racing driver who’d been killed at the 1924 Italian
Grand Prix (he had designed and built four powerful racing-cars called ‘Chitty’
or ‘Chitty Bang Bang’, which years later would provide Ian Fleming with the
name of his fictional vintage car). Built for racing at Brooklands, Chitty IV was powered by a 27-litre Liberty
aircraft engine and was in fact the largest capacity car to race at that famous
old circuit. Parry-Thomas, who actually lived in a house located within the
Brooklands circuit, not only substantially modified the car for his land speed
record attempt; he also gave it a new name – Babs.
In April 1926, Parry-Thomas and Babs went to Pendine. They didn’t just break Campbell’s record –
they smashed it, raising the bar to 170mph. Conditions hadn’t been ideal,
though, and Parry-Thomas reckoned that with some modifications Babs could do much better.
Campbell’s reaction to this was that he clearly needed a
bigger car. A new, more powerful Blue
Bird was built, powered by a 22.3-litre Napier aircraft engine (hence this
one’s full name, the Napier-Campbell Blue
Bird). Although the engine had a smaller capacity than that of Babs, it was the more powerful and as a
result this Blue Bird was reckoned to
be capable of breaking the 200mph barrier. In February 1927 Pendine Sands would
once again be the location for a record attempt. In the event, though, Campbell
was only able to raise Parry-Thomas’s record to 174mph; the new Blue Bird had achieved a top speed of
195mph but it was the two-way average speed over the one-kilometre course that
counted.
Parry-Thomas, meanwhile, had not been idle, having spent
the winter of 1926-27 rebuilding Babs’s
bodywork. His work complete, Babs was
ready for another record attempt and a month after Campbell’s new record had
been set, Parry-Thomas was back at Pendine. On 3rd March 1927, he
set out to win back the land speed record but he would end up going down in motorsport
history for a very different reason.
Quite what happened once Parry-Thomas had got Babs up to a speed of around 170mph has
been a matter of debate; some reckon that the drive-chain snapped, although it’s
more likely that there was a failure regarding one of the back wheels. What we
can say for certain is that the car went out of control at high speed and rolled
over, killing her driver who became the first person to die while attempting to
break the land speed record.
That was the last time Pendine was used for a land speed
record attempt; later that month, Henry Seagrave topped the 200mph barrier at
Daytona Beach in Florida, and it was to this location that Campbell would take
the Napier-Campbell Blue Bird for his
next (successful) land speed record attempt the following year.
As for Parry-Thomas, his body was buried in a churchyard
not far from Brooklands; Babs, however, was buried underneath the dunes at Pendine
Sands, and she would remain there for over four decades.
30.8.18
The mysterious pyramid in Falmouth
Reading about the Killigrew family in The
Grove of Eagles sparked my curiosity the next time I went to Falmouth.
Their manor house, Arwenack, was mostly destroyed in the Civil War although later it was partly restored and now stands today on Avenue Road, opposite
the Discovery Quay car park. Also in the immediate vicinity is the family’s
memorial, which takes the form of an unmarked granite obselisk – or rather, given
that its surfaces are triangular and they converge in a point at the top, an
unmarked granite pyramid.
At least, it is generally assumed to be the family’s memorial.
Known locally as the Killigrew Monument, it was erected
on the orders of one Martin Lister (d.1745), a soldier who had married into the
Killigrew family – and who’d had to change his name to Lister-Killigrew in
order to benefit from his wife’s inheritance, his wife Anne being the daughter
of Sir Peter Killigrew (d. 1705) and, as they had no children, the last of the
line. After his wife’s death in 1727, Lister-Killigrew left Falmouth but later
sent instructions to his steward at Arwenack that the stone pyramid be built. These
instructions were apparently quite detailed but its exact purpose is unclear as Lister-Killigrew was adamant that there should be no
inscription. Apparently he never saw it completed as he never returned to
Falmouth.
Standing some 44 feet high, the lack of inscription means
that the Killigrew Monument is something of a mystery although it is generally
assumed to have been intended as a memorial to the family who founded the town
of Falmouth in the seventeenth century. It has been moved a couple of times
since being erected, and has been at its current location since 1871. Local
legend has it that during one of the previous relocations, two wax-sealed glass
bottles were found underneath it. Accounts of this vary – some say the bottles
were filled with parchment or coins, while others say they were empty (which
sounds unlikely).
One of the more fanciful stories is that the pyramid is in
some way a means in indicating the location of buried treasure, for there has
been more than one story about the Killigrews of Arwenack being involved in
nefarious activities, from smuggling and receiving stolen goods to piracy and
murder. One of them, Mary Killigrew, who lived in the sixteenth century (the
actual years of her birth and death are unknown), was actually convicted of piracy
and sentenced to death although she was pardoned by Elizabeth I. She had sent
her servants to raid a Spanish ship that had sought shelter in Carrick Roads
(one of the largest natural harbours in the world and the reason for Falmouth’s
existence), and she is reckoned to have buried some of her ill-gotten gains in the
grounds of Arwenack House.
So could the Killigrew pyramid be a way of indicating
where Mary Killigrew’s treasure might be buried? It sounds unlikely, but as
Martin Lister-Killigrew didn’t say why he wanted the monument to be built, we’ve
no way of knowing for sure.
29.7.18
A story of Elizabethan Cornwall
Who was it who once said that you shouldn’t judge a book
by its cover? Not so long ago, I came across a very tatty paperback (spine
cracked, cover page rather faded and held on with Sellotape, original UK retail
price 80p) by Winston Graham, best known as the author of the Poldark books. This, though, was one of
his other ones, an historical novel called The
Grove of Eagles which was first published in 1963. The blurb was very complimentary
indeed, and despite having never previously read anything by Winston Graham (or
even bothered with Poldark, for that
matter) I decided to go for it.
The Grove of Eagles
is about the Killigrews, an influential Cornish family who were governors
of Pendennis Castle in Tudor times and who were later responsible for founding and
developing the port and town of Falmouth (being a semi-regular visitor to Falmouth
as part of my work, I already knew a little bit about this family, who as well
as being the local landowners were also heavily involved in smuggling and
piracy in that part of the world; their memorial, a granite pyramid erected by
the last of them, stands in Falmouth today opposite Arwenack House, the old
family home which was destroyed during the Civil War and rebuilt in the
eighteenth century). In the historical notes at the end, Graham describes them
as “a not unimportant Cornish family whose history appears and disappears
tantalisingly among the records of the time”. Which, I suppose, makes them an
ideal canvas for an historical novelist.
Several of the Killigrews of Arwenack House were called
John (it seems to have been a family tradition that this was the name given to
the eldest son) and there has been some confusion among historians not only
about the various John Killigrews but also their wives; due to knighthoods, history
records more than one Lady Killigrew and one such – a woman who was born Mary
Wolverston – has been confused with both her mother-in-law and her
grand-daughter-in-law, in addition to which we know neither the year in which
she was born nor the year in which she died! What we do know is that this
particular Lady K. often received stolen or smuggled goods at Arwenack House, and
that furthermore she was charged with piracy in 1582 when the crew of a Spanish
ship that had sheltered from a storm nearby were murdered and their cargo
stolen; she was actually sentenced to death for this but was pardoned by
Elizabeth I.
At the hands of Winston Graham, Lady Killigrew became one
of the more influential characters in The
Grove of Eagles, she being the formidable widowed mother of the master of
Arwenack House, John Killigrew (who in real life was born in c.1557 and died in
1605). At the time in which the novel is set, the last years of the sixteenth
century, this John Killigrew was in a key position. As well as being the local landowner, and a rather ruthless and unpopular one at that, he was also the governor of Pendennis
Castle and as such responsible for the defence of the mouth of the river Fal, “a
great natural anchorage, one of the finest in the world”, which could have been
of great strategic importance in the event of a Spanish invasion. Alas, the
defences as organised by John Killigrew were found wanting at the times of both
the Spanish raid on Cornwall in 1595 and the invasion threat of 1597 (of which
more later). Although his excuse was that he couldn’t afford to properly
garrison the castle (something of which he had informed the government on
several occasions), there were inevitably rumours about how loyal he actually was
to Elizabeth I – was he, perhaps, secretly in cahoots with the Spanish via
intermediaries such as the pirate captains with whom he associated? Although
allegations of treason on his part were unproven, in 1598 he was nevertheless
deprived of the governorship of Pendennis Castle, and he died in poverty seven
years later.
In real life, he had a large family by his wife (herself
a member of the Monck family); to this brood Winston Graham added an
illegitimate son, a boy unaware of his mother’s identity but nevertheless
acknowledged by John Killigrew as his son and brought up with that surname. It
is this boy, Maugan Killigrew, who narrates The
Grove of Eagles (which refers to the meaning of the name Killigrew, the
family coat-of-arms being a double-headed eagle which of course hints at all
sorts of duplicity on the grounds that it faces both ways), and what a tale his
creator has him tell!
This story of Elizabethan Cornwall, told from the point
of view of someone who is of gentry blood yet expected to have to make his own
way in the world, is a very good one. Graham, who in the novel’s postscript
makes much of having drawn on manuscripts from the time, shows a really good
understanding for the period. Where it gets really interesting, though, is when
you realise the extent to which The Grove
of Eagles is not only populated by real people but based very much on real
events, most notably events from the war between England and Spain which lasted
from the mid-1580s until the 1604 Treaty of London. Maugan is caught up in the resistance to the 1595 Spanish raid on Cornwall in which troops from four galleys landed
in Mount’s Bay and sacked Mousehole, Newlyn and Penzance, beating back a local
militia under Sir Francis Goldolphin (whose first wife was a Killigrew; when
not trying to defend England, he is shown to be warning his in-laws about how
their reputation for lawlessness will lead them to ruin) before withdrawing. Later,
Maugan is taken on as a secretary to no less a person than Sir Walter
Raleigh – for some reason, Graham makes a point of spelling his surname
‘Ralegh’ – and as such he gets to participate in the English capture of
Cadiz in 1596 which allows Graham to provide a fantastic description of this
event.
Much is made in The
Grove of Eagles of the Killigrews’ misfortune; what with the fate of one of
the John Killigrews (see above) it is a running theme in the book, with the
set-piece hearing before the Queen herself coming towards the novel’s end.
Early on, Graham gives an explanation of this via Maugan. Having referred to
the rebuilding of Arwenack House in the mid-sixteenth century on a grander
scale than before by another John Killigrew (this one being the grandfather of
Maugan’s father), it is noted that the Killigrew family, “for all its ancient
lineage and good estate, lacked the solidity of great possessions such as could
maintain without strain the extravagant way of life he set for it. From his
time, therefore, there was a hint of the feverish and the insolvent in our lives.
Each generation tried to re-establish itself; each generation failed in greater
measure than the last.” It is this which becomes key to both the family’s
apparent lack of regard for the law (any ship that uses the Fal estuary as a
haven is fair game, it seems) and the question of John Killigrew’s supposed
treachery.
Maugan seems to be particularly unlucky. Captured by the
Spanish in a raid on Pendennis Castle, he’s assumed to be dead and as a result
his love interest – a young lady whose family has been evicted from their house
by the Killigrews for defaulting on the rent – marries someone else (a circumstance
that Winston Graham also bestowed on his more famous creation, Ross Poldark;
apparently he got this particular idea from hearing the story of a pilot who he
met during the Second World War). Later on, our narrator (a bit of a rogue, but
one with a conscience of sorts – no Flashman, he) manages to get captured by
the Spanish again when returning from Cadiz – he gets put on a ship home by
Raleigh after getting injured in a fight while attempting to loot a church, and
after being imprisoned for several months he finds himself sailing on the
ill-fated Spanish Armada of 1597, the plan being that he will liaise with his father
once the invaders have landed in Cornwall. Fortunately for England but not for
Maugan Killigrew, this little-known attempt to invade founders thanks to the
weather, the result being that Maugan actually gets to go home by way of being
shipwrecked off the Cornish coast (the failure of this invasion attempt, which
happened in October 1597, really did owe much to a storm that wrecked and
scattered the Spanish ships; England was at the time very poorly defended, not just because of John Killigrew but also because most of its ships were absent on the Earl of Essex’s ill-fated expedition to the Azores). For anyone wondering about who Maugan’s mother is, rest assured that this gets revealed at the end although you could probably make an educated guess before then.
Having finished The
Grove of Eagles, I’m rather disappointed that Graham didn’t write a sequel;
even after more than 500 pages I found myself wanting more. Towards the end,
Maugan starts to work (against his better judgement) for Lord Henry Howard, a
courtier who would in a few years play a key role in putting James VI of
Scotland on the English throne after Elizabeth I’s death (for which he was
ennobled as the Earl of Northampton) and turning said king against Raleigh, a
man whom Maugan admires. It would have been fascinating to have Graham relate the story of how
this played out. As it is, The Grove of
Eagles ends with a pensive Maugan getting married, following which there’s a
‘postscript for purists’ which begins with Graham asserting that “bibliographies
in the historical novel are pretentious” – this at a time (1963) before the
likes of George MacDonald Fraser and Bernard Cornwell made historical notes a
standard practice for the historical novelist.
After revealing where he got the ideas for some of the
events of his novel from (for example: “the extent to which John Killigrew became
committed to the Spanish cause is perhaps arguable, but the evidence which
exists does seem to me conclusive … the conclusive testimony comes from the
Spanish side … I have no evidence that Ralegh [sic] spoke up for John Killigrew when he was brought to London to
answer for his behaviour, but it is not out of keeping with his character that
he should have done so”), he explains what happened to some of the characters in
the novel who were actually real people (“the mystery of Jane Fermor’s dowry has
never been cleared up”, “Jack Arundell of Trerice became Sir John Arundell and
was governor of Pendennis Castle in 1646”, etc) before mentioning that Maugan
was inspired in part by one Robert Killigrew, a friend of Raleigh’s “who was
later innocently involved in the murder of Sir Thomas Overbury”. I found myself
wanting to know more about this, and also wondering about what might have been
had Winston Graham decided to give Maugan another outing; here, alas, a character whose slender luck
sadly didn’t extend to a second novel.
But the first and only adventure of Maugan Killigrew, though,
is definitely worth reading. I just hope that, should you decide to do so, you
can find a copy that’s in better condition than the one I found!
25.7.18
England's lesser-known stone circles (part two)
To Cornwall next, to take a look at another stone circle!
This one can be found a couple of miles to the south-east of St Buryan which is
off the A30 after you’ve gone west of Penzance. This circle is called the Merry
Maidens and consists of nineteen granite megaliths, all of them roughly four
feet high arranged in a circle that’s about 78 feet in diameter. They’re said
to date back to either the Neolithic period (the late Stone Age) or the early
Bronze Age.
They’re easy to get to, being located in a field that’s easily
accessible (and sign-posted) from the B3315. The access-point to the field even
has a convenient lay-by for parking, and the footpath from the lay-by goes right through the circle itself.
As is apparently the case with most British stone
circles, there’s a notable gap between the stones at the circle’s eastern-most
part. It’s also worth noting that the size of the stones varies, decreasing
slightly in size from south-west to north-east; this, archaeologists reckon, may
well have been deliberate so as to mirror the cycle of the moon. Nearby are a
pair of much taller standing stones called the Pipers, two of the largest standing
stones in Cornwall which due to their alignment with the Merry Maidens are indelibly
associated with said circle.
Like the Rollrights, the Merry Maidens are the subject of
a ‘petrification’ legend which is where they get their name from. The story is
that the stones were nineteen young ladies who were turned to stone for dancing
on a Sunday (the stones’ Cornish name is dans
maen, which means ‘stone dance’ although it has given the stones their
alternative name of the Dawn’s Men). The Pipers are said to have been the two men who were
providing the music for the girls, but they heard the bells of the church at St
Buryan striking midnight and tried to run away, which supposedly explains their
distance from the Merry Maidens. The Maidens and the Pipers are not the only Neolithic
remnants in the vicinity; there’s also the Tregiffian Burial Chamber not far
away, as well as a lone standing stone called Gun Rith which is reckoned to be also linked with the Merry Maidens, by proximity if nothing else.
Of more recent vintage is the Boskenna Cross, Medieval a
way-marker located at the junction with the road to or from St Buryan to the
west; this was unearthed in the nineteenth century, having probably been buried
at the time of the Reformation.
The Merry Maidens probably owe their survival in part to
a nineteenth-century landowner who, obviously recognising their significance, ensured
that they weren’t removed so the field could be ploughed and the stones broken
up for building material – a fate that befell many stone circles in the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries. Western
Cornwall, though, does have a rather high concentration of ancient monuments – as
well as stone circles, there are also various standing stones as well as cairns,
hut circles and holy wells – which has led the area to be described as a ‘sacred
country in miniature’. Worth keeping an eye on the road-signs, then.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)




